This evening I worked with Buddy and Jojo, and we had a most excellent time. Joanne made me “sketti and balls” which was delicious, and there were cookies laying around too for Todd’s birthday. It was another slow night, but we survived by making fun of each other and everyone else (as is standard), and telling funny stories (like about our parents doing the unmentionable).
It was a bad night for drifters and hobos… our officers had to deal with one in our jurisdiction who was inhabiting a building he shouldn’t have, and we assisted a neighboring agency with getting photographs of a guy they think lives out in the woods and steals food. Like a hermi.. hermi… hermit crab? I don’t remember if that was the word I wanted or not.
A writer for USA Today came and spoke in my journalism class this morning about the Jason Blair scandal at the New York Times. He told us how, on several occasions, he noted obvious lies in Blair’s articles but it didn’t occur to him that they were actually fabrications, believing there was some explanation he wasn’t aware of. In retrospect, it was plain as day.
Some of my classmates couldn’t wrap their heads around this, thinking it was just too obvious and didn’t understand why Blair wasn’t caught. I understand what the guy means. I remember a very nice lady I worked with at a grocery store back home. One day she was hauled out in handcuffs for some type of a coupon-fraud scheme. In hindsight, there were a lot of questionable actions on her part that should have clued me in to the criminal plot unfolding in front of me over a long period of time. I was blind to it, because she was a nice lady, and why would I be suspicious? It’s human nature I suppose.
Editors at media outlets now have to find a balance between being respectful of their journalists, and being overly suspicious. Sometimes, when a story seems so good, you don’t see the flaws as an editor.
Sorry about the journaspeak… return to your regularly scheduled program.
Seacrest out.


























